Skip to content
VALVE&VINYL

The Best Subwoofers for Music

Every subwoofer roundup is written for a film room with an AV receiver doing the filtering. A two-channel system does neither — there is no high-pass on your main speakers and there may be no subwoofer output on your amplifier — and once you rank on that, the order changes.

By Stephen V.Published Last verified
A sealed subwoofer positioned beside a bookshelf speaker on a stand

The short answer

The SVS SB-1000 Pro is the pick, and for a music system the reason is its input panel as much as its 20 Hz. It is the only subwoofer here that publishes both a line-level input anda speaker-level input with their impedances stated (16 kΩ and 1 kΩ), an app-adjustable low-pass, and a frequency response — 20 – 270 Hz ±3 dB — with the measurement condition printed beside it, which no rival does. If your amplifier has a subwoofer output, the ELAC SUB3010 is the one to consider instead: its low-pass control is adjustable from 50 Hz, the only one here that reaches down to where a bookshelf speaker actually stops. If your amplifier has no subwoofer output and a small budget, the BIC F12 takes speaker-level input with automatic signal sensing.

Disclosure: we earn a commission if you buy through the links on this page, at no extra cost to you. It does not influence what we pick — our criteria are published and reproducible, so you can check our work. How we pick · Full disclosure

These picks are spec-and-price analyses, not listening tests. We have not heard this gear and we do not pretend to have: every figure below is sourced to the manufacturer and linked, and every price is live or not shown at all. Here are the rules we followed.

Quick picks

Ranked on the published criteria in How We Pick. Prices are live as of October 16, 2026. Tap any row for the full write-up.

An AV receiver does two things to a subwoofer signal that a stereo amplifier does not. It high-passes your main speakers, so they stop where the subwoofer starts and nothing is produced twice. And it hands over a dedicated low-frequency output on an RCA socket. A two-channel integrated amplifier may do neither, which means the subwoofer has to supply the connection and the filtering itself. That is why this page exists alongside our home theater subwoofer roundup, which ranks the same six products on different criteria and reaches a different order.

The two criteria that reorder the field

SubwooferSpeaker-level input?Low-pass rangePublished responseEnclosure
SVS SB-1000 ProYes — stereo, 1 kΩ statedApp-adjustable, plus 3 EQ bands20–270 Hz ±3 dB, condition statedSealed
ELAC SUB3010No — 2 × RCA only50–150 Hz, continuous28–150 Hz, no toleranceSealed + passive radiator
BIC America F12Yes — with auto signal sensingNot published25–200 Hz, no toleranceVented
Polk PSW10Yes — spring terminalsNot published40–160 Hz at −3 dBFront-ported
Polk Monitor XT12Yes — 5-way binding posts80–160 Hz — cannot go lowerNot published at allPorted
Klipsch R-120SWNo — line/LFE RCA onlyNot published29–120 Hz ±3 dBRear-ported

The bottom row is the inversion. The Klipsch R-120SW is our second pick for a home theater and it is not in the picks on this page at all, because its specification sheet says “line level / LFE RCA jacks only — NO speaker-level inputs”. If your integrated amplifier has no subwoofer output, this subwoofer cannot be connected to it without adding a line-level splitter ahead of the amplifier — route 3 in our connection guide. It also publishes no low-pass range, so you cannot know where you are setting the handover.

Why the low-pass floor matters more than the extension

With no high-pass on your main speakers, they keep playing everything they can. So the subwoofer’s low-pass should sit near the main speaker’spublished low-frequency limit, not at the 80 Hz that home theater convention assumes — because at 80 Hz with a bookshelf speaker flat to 50 Hz, both sources are producing the same content across a 30 Hz band and the level rises there.

Where the handover should sit, against what each control can actually do

target low-pass ≈ main speaker's published −3 dB point · overlap = low-pass setting − main speaker limit

Inputs

  • ELAC Debut 3.0 DB63 bookshelf response: 50 Hz – 34 kHz at −3 dB (owner's manual); 42 Hz – 38 kHz at −6 dB (product page) (ELAC spec page)
  • Q Acoustics 3030i response: 46 Hz – 30 kHz (+3 dB / −6 dB) (Q Acoustics spec page)
  • KEF Q3 Meta response: 49 Hz – 20 kHz (± 3 dB); 42 Hz – 20 kHz at −6 dB (KEF spec page)
  • Klipsch R-51M response: 62 Hz – 21 kHz ± 3 dB (Klipsch spec sheet (PDF))
  • ELAC SUB3010 crossover control: 50 – 150 Hz, continuously adjustable (ELAC product page)
  • Polk Monitor XT12 crossover control: 80 Hz – 160 Hz, continuously variable, plus LFE (Polk product page)

Result

DB63 mains (50 Hz): target 50–55 Hz— ELAC SUB3010 can; Polk XT12 cannot
3030i mains (46 Hz): target 50 Hz— ELAC can, at the very bottom of its range
Q3 Meta mains (49 Hz): target 50 Hz— ELAC can; XT12 cannot
R-51M mains (62 Hz): target 65 Hz— still below the XT12’s 80 Hz floor
XT12 at its minimum 80 Hz with DB63 mains: a 30 Hz band produced twice

Every bookshelf speaker in the registry wants a handover below 80 Hz, and the Polk Monitor XT12’s control does not go below 80 Hz. That is why the subwoofer with the largest cabinet in this group finishes last on this page. The ELAC is the only one whose published range reaches 50 Hz, which is the number three of these four speakers want.

A low-pass filter is a slope, not a wall, and both sources produce output either side of the setting — so these are starting points to be checked by ear, not final values. The main-speaker figures are published at different tolerances (ELAC gives −3 dB and −6 dB figures 8 Hz apart; Q Acoustics publishes an asymmetric +3 / −6 dB; Klipsch ±3 dB), so they are not strictly comparable with each other. Room gain typically adds output below about 100 Hz and shifts the right answer downward. Where a maker publishes no low-pass range at all — BIC, Polk PSW10, Klipsch — the control exists but its limits are undocumented, so you are setting it by ear with no scale.

1. SVS SB-1000 Pro — the only one that documents everything this job needs

A stereo speaker-level input at a stated 1 kΩ alongside RCA in andout at 16 kΩ, so it works with an amplifier that has a subwoofer output and with one that does not. A 325 W RMS continuous amplifier figure, which is a continuous rating and not a peak. A sealed 12-inch driver with 13.3 mm of published Xmax. And a frequency response of 20 – 270 Hz ±3 dB, measured 2 m ground-plane away from reflective structures — SVS is the only maker in this group that publishes the measurement condition at all, which is the difference between a specification and a claim.

For music the app matters more than it does for film: three parametric EQ bands per preset, adjustable low-pass, phase, polarity and room-gain compensation, which lets you correct a room mode without buying room correction. Our small-room bass guide has the modal arithmetic for working out which mode you are fighting.

2. ELAC SUB3010 — the right crossover range, the wrong input panel

50 – 150 Hz continuously adjustable is the only low-pass control here that reaches down to where a modern bookshelf speaker stops, and AutoEQ with eight parametric curves is genuine room correction in a subwoofer. The enclosure is sealed and loaded by a 10-inch passive radiator rather than a port, so there is no port to chuff. 28 Hz is published, though with no tolerance and no measurement condition, so it is not comparable to the SVS’s 20 Hz.

The catch is absolute: two RCA sockets and no speaker-level inputs. If your amplifier has no subwoofer pre-out, this is not a candidate. Among the amplifiers we cover, the Yamaha A-S501, Marantz PM6007, Denon PMA-600NE and Onkyo TX-8470 all publish one; the Cambridge AXA35 and Fosi V3 do not.

3. BIC America F12 — the cheapest answer for an amplifier with no sub out

High-level speaker inputs plus line-level LFE, with automatic signal sensing so it wakes when the amplifier does. 150 W RMS continuous (BIC publishes a 475 W dynamic peak alongside it; only the first is a rating). A vented 12-inch driver and a 25 Hz claim carrying no tolerance, which we treat as a claim.

Its gap is the low-pass range, which BIC does not publish. The control is there; its limits are not documented, so you cannot know whether you can reach 50 Hz until it is in the room. For a system with Klipsch mains wanting 65 Hz that is a smaller risk than for one with ELAC mains wanting 50 Hz.

4. Polk PSW10 — small, honest, and it takes speaker wire

Stereo line level plus two pairs of speaker-level spring terminals, and a published −3 dB response of 40 – 160 Hz. Note which figure we are quoting: Polk’s marketing copy on the same page says “down to 35 Hz” and Polk’s own specification table says 40 Hz. We publish the table. The amplifier is 100 W peak with no continuous rating published, and the port is on the front, which makes it the easiest of these to place close to a wall.

For a small room with bookshelf speakers it is the proportionate choice, and 40 Hz is only 10 Hz short of where the ELAC DB63 stops anyway — which raises the fair question of how much it is adding. Our whether-you-need-one page answers that against each speaker’s own published limit.

5. Polk Monitor XT12 — the biggest box, and it cannot filter low enough

The most complete input panel in the group on paper — line level, LFE and speaker level on 5-way binding posts — and a 2.72 cubic foot cabinet, the largest here. Two things put it last.

First, the low-pass range is 80 – 160 Hz, so it cannot be set below 80 Hz, and every bookshelf speaker in our registry wants a handover below 80 Hz. In a receiver-based system that is fine because the receiver high-passes the mains; in a stereo system it guarantees an overlap band. Second, Polk publishes no frequency response for this subwoofer at all and no amplifier wattage — the “down to 24 Hz” is a feature bullet with no tolerance and no condition, absent from the specification table. The largest cabinet here comes with the least data.

One subwoofer or two, for music

Two smaller subwoofers in different positions beat one larger one, and the reason is modal rather than acoustic output: two sources at different distances from the room boundaries excite the room’s modes differently, so the peaks and nulls of one partially fill the other’s. This is the same argument as on our subwoofer sizing guide and it applies with more force to music, because a stereo pair of main speakers already commits you to a symmetrical layout that a single subwoofer breaks.

If two is the plan, the input panel question becomes sharper still: a stereo amplifier with one subwoofer output needs a splitter, and a subwoofer with speaker-level inputs and a line-level pass-through — which among these is the SVS alone — can be daisy-chained without one.

How we would choose

Any stereo amplifier, and you want one decision you will not revisit: the SVS SB-1000 Pro. An amplifier with a subwoofer output and bookshelf speakers that reach 46 – 50 Hz: the ELAC SUB3010, for the 50 Hz low-pass floor and AutoEQ. No subwoofer output and a tight budget: the BIC F12. A small room: the Polk PSW10. And if you already own a Klipsch R-120SW, it is a good subwoofer in the wrong system — it needs a receiver or an amplifier with a pre-out.

Every pick in detail

Every specification below links to the manufacturer document we read it from. Where a manufacturer does not publish a figure, we say so rather than estimating it.

1.

SVS SB-1000 Pro

Best overall
SVS SB-1000 Pro
$599.00View on Amazon

Price as of October 16, 2026. #ad

The only subwoofer here whose manufacturer publishes both a continuous power rating and the measurement condition behind its frequency response — 20–270 Hz ± 3 dB at 2 m ground plane — which is what makes its numbers comparable to anything.

9.0/10
extension
9/10
published data
10/10
room control
10/10
value for money
6/10
build quality
9/10
Published specifications for the SVS SB-1000 Pro, each linked to the manufacturer document we read it from.
SpecificationPublished valueSource
Frequency response20–270 Hz ± 3 dB, measured 2 m ground plane away from reflective structures (quasi-anechoic). SVS is the only manufacturer in this group that publishes the measurement condition.SVS product page
Amplifier power325 W RMS continuous (820+ W peak dynamic), Sledge STA-325D class DSVS product page
Driver12 in long-throw, 13.3 mm Xmax / 26.9 mm Xmech, 1.5 in voice coilSVS product page
Enclosure typeSealed, extra-thick MDF front baffle with internal bracingSVS product page
InputsUnbalanced stereo RCA in/out (16 kΩ) plus speaker-level stereo input (1 kΩ); 3–12 V AC/DC triggerSVS product page
DSP / app50 MHz Analog Devices DSP; Bluetooth app for iOS/Android with 3 nameable presets, 3 parametric EQ bands per preset, adjustable low pass, phase, polarity and room-gain compensationSVS product page
Dimensions (with grille)13.5 in H × 13 in W × 14.76 in D (342 × 330 × 375 mm)SVS product page
Weight26 lb (11.9 kg) unboxed with grilleSVS product page

Pros

  • 325 W RMS continuous is a continuous rating, not a peak figure dressed as one
  • 20–270 Hz ± 3 dB published WITH its measurement condition — nobody else here does that
  • App DSP with three parametric EQ bands per preset and room-gain compensation, which is real control over the one band room correction handles worst
  • Speaker-level inputs as well as RCA, so an integrated amp with no sub output can still drive it
  • Sealed 13-inch cabinet — it fits where a ported 12 will not

Cons

  • The most expensive pick here
  • Sealed alignment trades raw output near tuning for a gentler roll-off — a ported box of the same size will play louder at 30 Hz
  • The app is the interface for the good features; the front panel alone is not
  • One of these in a large open-plan room will run out before a bigger ported sub does

Skip it if your room is large and open-plan and output matters more to you than measured accuracy. A ported 12 costs less and moves more air down low.

2.

ELAC Debut 2.0 SUB3010

Best automatic room EQ
ELAC Debut 2.0 SUB3010
$499.00View on Amazon

Price as of October 16, 2026. #ad

A 10-inch sealed box loaded by a passive radiator instead of a port, with app-driven AutoEQ — the cheapest way here to get measured room correction on the subwoofer itself rather than on the receiver.

7.6/10
extension
7/10
published data
6/10
room control
9/10
value for money
6/10
build quality
8/10
Published specifications for the ELAC Debut 2.0 SUB3010, each linked to the manufacturer document we read it from.
SpecificationPublished valueSource
Frequency response28 – 150 Hz. ELAC publishes no ± dB tolerance and no measurement condition, so this figure is not directly comparable to the SVS or Klipsch numbers.ELAC product page
Amplifier power400 W peak / 200 W RMS, BASH-trackingELAC product page
Driver10 in high-excursion doped paper cone, with a 10 in doped paper passive radiatorELAC product page
Enclosure typeSealed cabinet loaded by a passive radiator rather than a port — no port to chuffELAC product page
Crossover frequency50 – 150 Hz, continuously adjustableELAC product page
Inputs2 × RCA (L, R/LFE) — no speaker-level inputsELAC product page
Room EQAutoEQ with app control (iOS and Android); ELAC states eight parametric curvesELAC product page
Dimensions14.33 in W × 13.5 in H × 13.5 in D (364 × 343 × 343 mm)ELAC product page
Weight32.1 lb (14.5 kg)ELAC product page

Pros

  • AutoEQ with app control corrects the subwoofer to the room, which is the band a receiver's room correction handles least well
  • Passive radiator rather than a port — no port to chuff at high excursion, and no minimum wall distance to respect
  • 200 W RMS published alongside the 400 W peak
  • Crossover continuously adjustable 50–150 Hz, published
  • The shallowest cabinet here at 13.5 inches deep

Cons

  • The 28–150 Hz figure carries no ± dB tolerance and no measurement condition, so it cannot be compared like-for-like with the SVS or Klipsch numbers
  • RCA inputs only — no speaker-level connection
  • A 10-inch driver in a small sealed box will not match a 12-inch ported sub for raw output
  • Stock is intermittent; this is an older model in ELAC's line

Skip it if you want maximum output per dollar. A 12-inch ported box beats it on volume, and you are paying here for the EQ and the size.

3.

BIC America F12

Best for older amplifiers
BIC America F12
$299.00View on Amazon

Price as of October 16, 2026. #ad

An old design that does the two things this bracket usually gets wrong: it publishes a continuous power rating next to the peak one, and it takes speaker-level inputs from an amplifier with no subwoofer output.

7.0/10
extension
6/10
published data
6/10
room control
3/10
value for money
8/10
build quality
6/10
Published specifications for the BIC America F12, each linked to the manufacturer document we read it from.
SpecificationPublished valueSource
Frequency response25 Hz – 200 Hz. No ± dB tolerance is published, so treat the 25 Hz as a claim rather than a comparable spec.BIC America product page
Amplifier power475 W dynamic peak / 150 W RMS continuous, BASH design. Both figures are BIC's; only the second is a continuous rating.BIC America product page
Driver12 in injection-molded long-throw woofer, front-firingBIC America product page
Enclosure typeVented, with BIC's patented “Venturi” ventBIC America product page
Sensitivity90 dBBIC America product page
InputsHigh-level (speaker-level) inputs plus line-level LFE, with automatic signal sensingBIC America product page
Dimensions17 in H × 14.75 in W × 17.25 in DBIC America product page
Weight42 lbBIC America product page
Low-pass crossover rangeNot published—

Pros

  • 475 W peak AND 150 W RMS continuous both published — the split most listings hide
  • High-level (speaker-level) inputs, so it connects to a vintage integrated or a receiver with no sub out
  • Automatic signal sensing, so it powers itself up
  • 12-inch driver and a published 90 dB sensitivity

Cons

  • The 25 Hz – 200 Hz response is published without any ± dB tolerance, so the 25 Hz is a claim rather than a comparable measurement
  • BIC does not publish the low-pass crossover range at all
  • 42 lb — the heaviest subwoofer here
  • A long-running design; the cabinet and finish show it next to the Polk and ELAC

Skip it if you want published data you can check. BIC gives you a continuous power figure and then no tolerance on the frequency response, which is half a spec sheet.

4.

Polk Audio PSW10

Best for a small room
Polk Audio PSW10
$249.00View on Amazon

Price as of October 16, 2026. #ad

The cheapest way into a real .1 channel, and the one where Polk's own page argues with itself — the marketing says 35 Hz, the specification table says the −3 dB point is 40 Hz.

6.0/10
extension
3/10
published data
7/10
room control
3/10
value for money
8/10
build quality
5/10
Published specifications for the Polk Audio PSW10, each linked to the manufacturer document we read it from.
SpecificationPublished valueSource
Frequency response (−3 dB)40 Hz → 160 Hz. Polk's own marketing copy on the same page says “down to 35 Hz”; the specification table says 40 Hz. We publish the table.Polk product page
Amplifier power100 W peak, class D. Polk publishes no continuous rating for this model — the 100 W is a peak figure.Polk product page
Amplifier bandwidth / distortion40 Hz – 200 Hz, < 1% distortionPolk product page
Driver10 in Dynamic Balance polymer composite conePolk product page
Enclosure typeVented via front-panel flared portPolk product page
InputsStereo line level (2 × RCA) plus speaker level (2 pairs of gold-plated spring terminals)Polk product page
Dimensions14.375 in H × 14 in W × 16.125 in D (36.5 × 35.6 × 41 cm)Polk product page
Weight26 lb (11.8 kg)Polk product page

Pros

  • Polk publishes proper −3 dB limits (40 Hz → 160 Hz), which most sub makers at this price do not
  • Line level AND speaker level inputs, so it works with almost anything
  • 26 lb and the smallest 10-inch box here — it disappears in an apartment
  • Amplifier bandwidth and distortion (< 1%) are published

Cons

  • 40 Hz is a genuinely limited bottom end for film — the LFE track goes an octave below that
  • Polk's own marketing on the same page claims 35 Hz against its own spec table's 40 Hz
  • 100 W is a PEAK figure; Polk publishes no continuous rating for this model
  • No DSP, no app, no room correction

Skip it if your room is bigger than a bedroom or you watch action films at volume. This is the entry point, and it is honest about being one.

5.

Polk Monitor XT12

Best connectivity
Polk Monitor XT12
$319.00View on Amazon

$399.0020% off

Price as of October 16, 2026. #ad

A braced, ported 12-inch with line, LFE and binding-post inputs and a published 80–160 Hz crossover — and a manufacturer specification table that lists no amplifier power and no frequency response at all.

6.6/10
extension
5/10
published data
2/10
room control
4/10
value for money
7/10
build quality
8/10
Published specifications for the Polk Monitor XT12, each linked to the manufacturer document we read it from.
SpecificationPublished valueSource
Amplifier powerNot published—
Frequency responseNot published—
Manufacturer's bass claimPolk's feature bullet says “smooth low frequency extension down to 24 Hz”. It appears nowhere in the specification table, carries no ± dB tolerance and no measurement condition — so it is a claim, not a spec.Polk Monitor XT12 info sheet (PDF)
Amplifier typeClass A/BPolk product page
Low-pass crossover80 Hz – 160 Hz, continuously variable, plus LFEPolk product page
Phase adjustment0/180Polk product page
Driver12 in bi-laminate paper cone with foam surroundPolk product page
Enclosure typeBass reflex (ported), braced MDFPolk product page
InputsLine level, LFE (single RCA) and speaker level via left/right 5-way binding postsPolk product page
Dimensions16 in W × 16.4 in H × 17.9 in D (407 × 418 × 456 mm)Polk product page
Weight39 lb (17.7 kg)Polk product page

Pros

  • Line level, LFE and 5-way binding posts — the most complete input set here alongside the SVS
  • Low-pass crossover published as 80–160 Hz continuously variable, with 0/180 phase
  • Braced low-resonance MDF cabinet with a removable grille
  • A 12-inch driver in a ported box — the alignment that moves the most air for the money

Cons

  • Polk's specification table publishes NO amplifier wattage and NO frequency response — the “down to 24 Hz” is a marketing bullet with no tolerance and no measurement condition
  • 39 lb and 17.9 inches deep
  • No DSP, no app, no room EQ — volume, crossover, phase and nothing else
  • Nothing published that lets you compare it against the SVS or the Klipsch on paper

Skip it if you want to check the claim before you buy. There is no published response spec here to check it against.

Frequently asked questions

What is the best subwoofer for music?
The SVS SB-1000 Pro. For a two-channel system it is the only one of the six we cover that publishes everything the job needs: a speaker-level stereo input at 1 kilohm alongside RCA in and out at 16 kilohms, an app-adjustable low-pass with three parametric EQ bands, and a frequency response of 20 to 270 Hz plus or minus 3 dB with the measurement condition printed beside it — which no rival publishes.
Why does a music subwoofer need different criteria than a home theater one?
Because an AV receiver high-passes your main speakers and provides a dedicated subwoofer output, and a stereo integrated amplifier may do neither. With no high-pass, your main speakers keep playing everything they can, so the subwoofer's low-pass has to be set near the main speaker's own low-frequency limit rather than at the conventional 80 Hz. And with no subwoofer output, the subwoofer needs speaker-level inputs to be connectable at all.
Can I use a Klipsch R-120SW with a stereo amplifier?
Only if your amplifier has a subwoofer output, or you add a line-level splitter ahead of the amplifier. Klipsch's spec sheet for it says 'line level / LFE RCA jacks only — no speaker-level inputs'. It is our second pick for a home theater and it is not in the picks on this page for exactly that reason. It also publishes no low-pass range, so you cannot know where you are setting the handover.
What should I set the subwoofer crossover to for music?
Near your main speaker's published low-frequency limit, not at 80 Hz. An ELAC Debut 3.0 DB63 is 50 Hz at minus 3 dB, so 50 to 55 Hz; a Q Acoustics 3030i is 46 Hz; a KEF Q3 Meta 49 Hz; a Klipsch R-51M 62 Hz, so 65 Hz. Setting 80 Hz with 50 Hz mains and no high-pass means a 30 Hz band is produced by both sources at once, and the level rises there.
Which subwoofers have speaker-level inputs?
Four of the six we cover: the SVS SB-1000 Pro (stereo, 1 kilohm stated), the BIC America F12 (with automatic signal sensing), the Polk PSW10 (spring terminals) and the Polk Monitor XT12 (5-way binding posts). The ELAC SUB3010 and the Klipsch R-120SW have RCA inputs only and need an amplifier with a subwoofer output.
Why is the Polk Monitor XT12 ranked last when it has the biggest cabinet?
Two reasons. Its low-pass control range is 80 to 160 Hz, so it cannot be set below 80 Hz, and every bookshelf speaker in our registry wants a handover below 80 Hz — in a stereo system that guarantees an overlap band. And Polk publishes no frequency response and no amplifier wattage for it at all; the 'down to 24 Hz' is a feature bullet with no tolerance and no measurement condition, absent from the specification table.
Are two subwoofers better than one for music?
Yes, and the reason is modal rather than loudness. Two sources at different distances from the room boundaries excite the room's modes differently, so the peaks and nulls of one partially fill in the other's. It applies with more force to music than to film, because a stereo pair of main speakers already commits you to a symmetrical layout that a single subwoofer breaks.
Have you measured any of these subwoofers?
No. Every figure is the manufacturer's own published number with the document it was read from, and the differences in how they were published are part of the ranking. SVS is the only maker here stating a measurement condition. ELAC and BIC publish extension figures with no tolerance. Polk publishes a minus 3 dB figure for the PSW10 that contradicts its own marketing copy on the same page, and no frequency response at all for the XT12.

Sources

Every specification on this page was read from one of these documents. If one of them has changed, or we have made an error, tell us — corrections are logged and dated per our editorial policy.